Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Clement Tabur vs Theo Papamalamis Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tabur vs Papamalamis analysis and find out who is favored!
Clement Tabur vs Theo Papamalamis Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Tabur 1 - 0 Papamalamis
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tabur has won 47.3% of points on their second serve, while Papamalamis has won 49.5%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tabur, in recent form, has won 51.47% of their opponent's second serve points, while Papamalamis has won 54.31%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.43% and 32.6% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tabur has saved 61.19% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Papamalamis has saved 57.25% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tabur has won 67.11% of matches played (W/L 51/ 25), with Papamalamis winning 47.62% (W/L 10/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tabur has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 73/ 36), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 46% (W/L 29/ 34). Papamalamis has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 4/ 5), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 42% (W/L 8/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Tabur has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 83.33% of matches (W/L 35/ 7), where as Papamalamis has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 10/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tabur winning 1 times and Papamalamis being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Tabur winning 2 and Papamalamis winning 0. The last match between Tabur and Papamalamis was at the M15 Creteil, 10-03-2022, Second, I.hard with Clement Tabur getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:20:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tabur and Papamalamis have played a deciding set 0 times, with Tabur winning 0 times and Papamalamis 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Tabur winning 0, and Papamalamis 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tabur has played against opponents with an average rank of 267.24 while Papamalamis has played against players with an average rank of 204.52.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tabur has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Papamalamis has won 25% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tabur has converted 36.32% of breakpoint opportunities, and Papamalamis has converted 38.85% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
236
Rank
202
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
61% (242-157)
Career Total W/L
43% (13-17)
48% (14-15)
YTD W/L
50% (9-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Clement Tabur vs Theo Papamalamis For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Tabur VS Papamalamis
Sportsbook
Offer
Tabur VS Papamalamis H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Clement Tabur | Theo Papamalamis |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:20:0 | 1:20:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (30/45) | 61% (34/56) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (23/30) | 47% (16/34) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 60% (9/15) | 41% (9/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 25% (1/4) |
| Return Points W% | 55% (31/56) | 29% (13/45) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Tabur VS Papamalamis H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Clement Tabur
Player
Theo Papamalamis
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Clement Tabur | Theo Papamalamis |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 48% (14/15) | 50% (9/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (31/33) | 52% (22/20) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (309/303) | 50% (196/196) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 54% (14/12) | 50% (2/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (7/7) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.25 | 0.24 |
| Aces Total | 74 | 46 |
| DFs per game | 0.37 | 0.12 |
| DFs Total | 109 | 22 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:50:6 | 1:53:33 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 253.17 | 189.39 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1254/2013) | 62% (808/1307) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (835/1254) | 65% (527/808) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (359/759) | 49% (247/499) |
| BPs Won% Total | 36% (85/234) | 39% (54/139) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (861/2060) | 40% (518/1280) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 44% (8/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (6/2) | 53% (9/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 48% (14/29) | 47% (8/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 75% (3/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 29% (2/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (12/12) | 67% (12/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (12/0) | 33% (12/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 12% (17/2) | 17% (6/1) |
Clement Tabur Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Hugo Gaston
Player
Clement Tabur
50%
(
56 of
111)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
93)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
62%
(
34 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
45 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
107
Total Points Won
97
|
6-2 6-7(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Gauthier Onclin
75%
(
66 of
88)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
89)
98
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Clement Tabur
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Clement Tabur
66%
(
59 of
89)
1st Serve %
54%
(
58 of
108)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
50 of
108)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
52%
(
44 of
84)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Marco Cecchinato
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
2
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Clement Tabur
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Clement Tabur
59%
(
69 of
117)
1st Serve %
51%
(
54 of
105)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
53 of
69)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
46%
(
22 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
36%
(
42 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
105)
117
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(4) 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Victor Lilov
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Clement Tabur
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
7
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Theo Papamalamis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Theo Papamalamis
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
10 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Theo Papamalamis
Player
Lucas Poullain
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
83%
(
44 of
53)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Theo Papamalamis
Player
Matt Ponchet
65%
(
55 of
85)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gregoire Barrere
Player
Theo Papamalamis
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
46%
(
28 of
61)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Theo Papamalamis
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
47 of
84)
13
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Theo Papamalamis
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
Player
Theo Papamalamis
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
46%
(
33 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
76
Total Points Won
76
|
1-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Tabur Vs Papamalamis Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Tabur are available here and Papamalamis photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Clement Tabur
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
